The ultimate DVD vs. Blu-ray 1080p Capturing? Notch vid? O Comparing
As for the music? T? L? Load the MP3 file for free right here: matrix sharing. com website – www. zaranyzerak. com my album? Empire State Building “- http (also on Amazon and iTunes!) Twitter – www. Twitter. com Audio Blog – zaranyzerak. Tumblr. com Friday Night Chatroom – http now. NGST L IS? Fest?? Munich? Lliga! I don? To leave comments for people on my vid capture? screen comparison old complains? Ber that it is only 720p. kiddies Well, YouTube just 720p at the time o? the vid? oa ? t? made, and not imagine, until? 1080p for a few months after? s he? crit. If I k, the time nnte? Ckdrehen and? Change, what I am?. In Instead, I have to? cid? to the n? Chste Best thing and this? Publishing bet? day and EPIC f? R-you! Not only is it b? b? complete 1080p? you and Sch? Sse r? alis? many movies that are not vid into the past (with particular attention? re?? g? s “films? also? t?), but it contains LT? Also compl? ment ? Techno professional Rippin ‘G? ste by yours truly. Enjoy! Here are some links if you want more m?, Just go further comparisons: www. youtube. com – My good friend has any comparison Geeoh19 vids time, so what? berPR? its fen you things if you want a glimpse at the best of the best (and worst) on Blu-ray! www. caps-a-holic. com – D? share f battle their HD section? r the best DVD vs. Blu-ray the comparisons? there! http – Now these guys? s (and M are aware? dels), which should look like? the fifth? my! And they? scribe in the sky when a Blu-ray comes out, it is not? height. Screens Galore (research? PIX? a group of ‘em) find tons … B>
This entry was posted by admin on September 9, 2010 at 10:22 am, and is filed under Home Audio & Video. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0.You can leave a response or trackback from your own site.
-
#2 written by Zaranyzerak 1 year ago
-
#3 written by Zaranyzerak 1 year ago
@theguyi26 The colors were CORRECTED. The DVD editions often had incorrect color timing. The Blu-ray editions are usually closer to what was intended, and/or closer to how it appears on the original film. Sometimes it’s changed drastically as an artistic decision, but most of the time (as in these examples) the Blu-ray shows it as it should be, whereas the DVDs were inaccurate.
-
#5 written by theguyi26 1 year ago
“Hopefully this settles it once and for all” wtf when was there ever a “debate” about Blu-Ray NOT being an improvement maybe if you had a stupid petty argument with some retarded friends but don’t act like you’re some sort of awesome dude going against the grain, or making a point, I mean this is common knowledge and I have never met anyone in my life that disagreed with it.
-
#7 written by Zaranyzerak 1 year ago
@Pageyindahouse Correct. Same number of pixels on both, just different size of pixels. With the smaller sets, obviously you won’t see as much of the fine detail simply because the pixels are smaller than the head of a pin… Sitting closer certainly helps, but ideally you just want a bigger TV to get the most out of it. I suspect a lot of these people who claim there’s no difference are watching on tiny TVs from across the room.
-
#8 written by Pageyindahouse 1 year ago
@Zaranyzerak people who say there is no difference are absolutly retarded or blind. even on my 1080i/720p tv i can notice a massive difference in detail and picture quality and sound. on 1080p it is x6 better picture quality.
one question, if there are 1080 progressive lines running up a 50 inch tv and 1080p lines running up a 32 inch tv, wouldnt the pixels be smaller than the 50 inch tv? so it would not be the the size of the tv that determains level of detail but how close you sit? -
#10 written by Seaclam67 1 year ago
@bladerj: Dude, it is completely correct. Take a digital photo shot on an 8 megapixel point & shoot or camera on the lastest phones(very small pixel density). Blow it up to something like a door poster. Then do the same with a 21 megapixel full frame SLR(large pixel density) and you’ll see really quick the relation to DVD vs Blu-ray. You are starting with a file(DVD) that contains far less resolution, encoded at a far less bit rate.
-
#12 written by Zaranyzerak 1 year ago
@bladerj And how, exactly would it be more “fair?” This is as fair as it can possibly be, accurately showing BOTH as they would be seen on a HDTV display. If you’re watching DVD on a HDTV, it is upscaled to 1080p. So what would you propose, leaving the DVD image at roughly 1/6th the size of the 1080p image to be more “accurate?” That would be ludicrous. This comparison cannot possibly be more fair, it shows them both as they ARE and as they would typically be seen.
-
#16 written by krups123321 1 year ago
Why is there even a debate? Why are so many people morons? 640×480 pixels for SD or 1900×1080 for HD thats 3TIMES the image size!!! You get so much more detail in each frame and the images are sharper too, you can make out faces and buttons on the cash register.
The celuloid film that old films were made on actually HIGHER QULAITY than blurays, unlike a SD or HD camera, they are not limited by pixel size/density or colour charts etc. They capture a 1:1 likeness of anything they are pointed at!! -
#17 written by Zaranyzerak 1 year ago
@Nomnivore7531 And no, they don’t look exactly the same. On a dinky little 27″ HDTV yes, they will look close but even on a screen that small not the same. Blu-ray is 6x the resolution of DVD – 1920×1080 vs 720×480. Try watching on a larger screen. You blow up blu-ray to a big screen you see more and more detail the larger you go. Try that with DVD, it just gets more and more pixellated. They most definitely are NOT the same, in any way, no matter how “well mastered” the DVD version may be.
-
#19 written by Zaranyzerak 1 year ago
@Nomnivore7531 This is NOT rigged. I don’t fake out my viewers. If anything, this is the most fair comparison possible. This compares the BEST available DVD editions with the Blu-ray versions. It can’t possibly be more fair. The point of this was to show OLDER movies and how they compare. First, Eva 1.01/1.11 is animated. The difference with animation is not as noticeable as live action. Second, it’s brand new. Two reasons why that comparison is irrelevant to the subject of this video.
-
#20 written by Nomnivore7531 1 year ago
this is rigged, yes on a very close comparison Blu-ray is better than DVD, but on your TV screen 95% of amercans CAN’T tell the difference from SD to HD, and i tested that, i played the DVD Version of “Eva 1.01″ and the Blu-ray version of “Eva 1.11″ same movie that just came out this year, they look exactly the same, now if you remaster movies to 1080p yes the do look better, but if you put that on a DVD it look just as good, thats the hole thing of remastering movies.
-
#22 written by Ragedoom 1 year ago
@2dumb2care Zaranyzerak explains it very good. You need to take the original and process it. If you burn it from DvD, the quality will be the same. When putting a video on a DvD you have a limted amount of data you can store and then you need to down the quality and compress the video to fit. On a blue-ray, however, you got alot more space and then you don’t need to compress the video that much, or at all, depending on how long it is.
-
#23 written by Zaranyzerak 1 year ago
@2dumb2care No. Upconversion means that the original 720×480 standard definition image of the DVD has been upconverted (resized) to 1920×1080 for display on a 1080p display. A lot of people think these screenshot comparison downgrade the 1080p image to 480p, while the opposite is actually true. I present both as they would typically appear on a 1080p display. It has nothing to do with Blu-ray, it simply means the image has been scaled and processed to look better on a 1080p display.
-
#25 written by thelucasveloso 1 year ago
I will buy Blu-Ray when it replaces DVD once and for all, and when its prices are reasonable enough in the country I live. I spent a lot of time in my DVD collection and am simply not willing to replace it all again just because the market tells me so. Besides, I cannot argue against the quality of HD-Video, but I´m not at all bothered by DVD´s quality. In the end, A good movie is a good movie, be it in VHS, DIVX, DVD or BD.
-
- Comment Feed for this Post
- For the Ultimate in Entertainment, Get Residence Audio and Residence Theater Installation from Your Neighborhood Pros
- Ultimate Automobile HiFi Shop
- Dallas Laptop or computer Repair Providers, an Greatest Selection for Remote Pc Support
- Free Screen Capturing Video Software for Realtors: Generate Leads Who are Already Sold on You
- Decide on HDMI More than Element Video For Your High definition tv and Blu-Ray Participant
- Breakthrough In Comparing Prepaid Mobile Plans
- Digital MP5, Soul Ultimate Home
- Comparing between Contact Lenses and Glasses?
- The ultimate truth about the lenses Circle GEO Exposed!
- Twitter resources – your business card online Ultimate
@theguyi26 Just look around YouTube. Read some of the comments for my other HD-related videos. There are PLENTY of idiots out there who honestly think there’s no difference. I wouldn’t have made that statement if there was no basis for it. Don’t assume that just because you PERSONALLY have not experience that kind of nonsense that it doesn’t exist. It most definitely does, and that’s why I made these videos.